About a month
ago, someone sent me what appeared to be a desperate letter questioning the legitimacy of
some instructor that apparently opened his doors and claimed to be affluent in many
martial arts. He also questioned whether it is healthy for his 20 year old son to be
living with this instructor, a person he describes: " . . . argues his point ALL
the time, and insists that ONLY his way is the right way?" He states his son is
strong willed and very independent - and respects this instructor. His dojo allegedly has
a uchi-deshi (live-in and learn) program.
Let me state: I have never studied uchi-deshi
style. There was no program in existence in the 1960's, 70's, or most of the 80's, in this
continent. Japanese yudansha I studied from (such as Koichi Tohei, Isao Takahashi, etc.)
have lectured most of us on this mode of study. As a matter of fact, this mode of study in
Japan was not offered to women because of sexual gender.
I don't know the dojo that that this young person is
studying from and it really doesn't matter at this point.
I have known many Aikidoka in my life, that have been deshi in
Japan, however I have no idea what the majority of dojos in America mean when they refer
to their dojos as "uchi-deshi". This is unregulated from what many Aikido
associates tell me, and from what I have dug up. I would sincerely hope some of them are
honorable, but as we all know from experience--- the "buyer beware". You never
know what you'll get.
In the matter of the "expert at all martial arts instructor", it
is difficult to ascertain whether one can be proficient enough to be called an expert at
one martial art, let alone a whole handful of assorted martial arts. It is also takes a
very long time to acquire the expertise. As one of my Kung-fu instructors told me (Ming Li
- Seven Stars Praying Mantis and Hong Kong champion of 1965), that you may study many
different forms, but you pick one form to be your own and you study it primarily.
You cannot be an expert at everything -- no one is that good
(maturity, common sense, and experience tells you that . . .), but you can concentrate and
focus to be the owner and proficient at one or two things. It's like trying to hold many
tools in your hands. You can only hold onto so many at one time. They soon become too
heavy and awkward to hold onto. We sometimes want to believe that we are good at
everything, that our martial art is invincible, and that we can be a master of all. It is
amazing what illusions we want to paint, and what we allow ourselves to sheepishly surrender to.
Often times we allow them to cloud our judgement.
In Asian thought, you have to do something over 1000 times to be
able to have adequate skill. It takes 10,000 times to become near the level of expert.
Training takes time, maturity, patience, and a lot of practice. Knowledge and training
cannot be rushed or compiled like pointless - cheap trophies on a shelf (this is not an
insult to anyone collecting trophies, but my son has a ton of these cheap things
from scouts and all they do is take up a lot shelf space). My point: It takes years to
become proficient at one thing - how good can you really be --- if you have studied a lot
of things? The old adage: "Jack of many trades -- Master of None", comes
to mind.
From what this man told me, his son is 20 years old. I firmly
believe that a person his age should be utilizing his youth and energies towards a formal
education before applying himself/herself towards a vocation. If you become better exposed
to the formal martial arts world, you'll find that the most refined and well respected
martial artists are polished, mannerly, and speak well of themselves. They are cultured
enough to be able to handle their own in a conversation on Taoism, Jean-Paul Sartre or
Friedrich Nietzsche. These individuals can respectfully support themselves in both the
business world and the serious martial arts world.
Formal education can broaden a young person's perspectives and
expose him to other cultures, philosophies, sciences, --- the things he will need to
develop and mature for himself. Most of all - he or she will be respected. And this is
practical education to last a lifetime and to build upon. After formal education, martial
arts can be better sought after.
I question: How much will this young person be allowed to learn or
learn for himself in a dojo that has no formal education to offer? How much will he / she
learn from an instructor that may have no formal education? How much can be learned when
the instructor's martial arts' training and education is questionable, as well?
Many Japan trained deshi such as: Koichi Tohei 10th Dan and Michio
Hikitsuchi, 10th Dan (to name only a few) are very well educated. Their education spans
over many subjects, beyond the regular martial arts studies (of Judo, Kendo, Karate,
etc.), and is enhanced by the areas of philosophy (Zen Buddhism,
Confucianism, etc.), tea
ceremony, horsemanship, archery, flower arranging, painting, art, etc. Formal education is
a respected characteristic among martial artists. Some of the most famous Samurai were
well educated.
In regards to this man's son and his relationship with this dojo ---
it sounds as if he has serious concerns about the instructor his son is studying from.
As I mentioned before: " . . . This is
unregulated from what many Aikido associates tell me, and from what I have dug up. I would
sincerely hope some of them are honorable, but as we all know from experience--- the
"buyer beware". You never know what you'll get."
In a response - I asked this man: But if your gut feeling is
that this person is not a good influence on your son --- I ask you:
What does your common sense tell you? What does your parental
feelings tell you?
The instructor or "sensei", is a very serious role and
not for those that want to be "sensei" for the illusion of power. It is for
those honorable persons that can instruct with discipline --- yet with gentle firmness,
give knowledge and train the student. This role is not to be dishonored, by those
individuals that seek to wield the "sensei-role" with abusive intent.
I received a warm response back from this man. But in this note, he
stated that he had to stop his son's training at this place because his son sustained a
shoulder injury due to repeated hard throwing. He took the trouble to tell me that his son
is 5' 7" and about 130lbs and the instructor is 6' and 200lbs.
I would hope a more experienced instructor would be able to
recognize an injury to one of his/her students and have the common sense to deal with it,
instead of allowing the injury to worsen.
In my traditional training, if you or your partner became injured
during workout it has always been customary to stop and investigate. We were trained in
Shiatsu to treat minor injuries. We were warned that no one was allowed to be promoted to
shodan without first learning the basics Shiatsu. If you could not help repair the injury,
you were not learning the martial arts.
Formal education can open many doors, sharpen the rough edges on a
young person's mannerisms, and even elicit respect from those around you. It can change
personality from a barbaric brawler to a gentlemanly samurai warrior.
6/15/99
**********
Cheryl Matrasko is a Network Analyst for the
department of Networking and Communications at a prominent Chicago hospital. Formerly the
LAN Administrator for
Northwestern University Medical School - Department of OB/GYN, and assistant LAN
Administrator to the previous MIS of the School of Law. Cheryl started Aikido in 1965,
studying under Isao Takahashi as her first instructor. She enjoyed working out under many
well known Aikido instructors during her tenure with Takahashi Sensei and thereafter
following his death in 1971. Cheryl has dedicated time with instructors in Northern
Shaolin
Long-Fist, Seven Stars Praying Mantis, and Daito-Ryu Aikijujitsu. Currently, she is
instructing Aikido at Northwestern University's Chicago Campus and founded Aikido World
Journal.
Literary materials, film clips, and
pictures are
copyrighted by their respected authors and owners.
Permission in writing must be made for any
duplication, display, or reprint. |